Here is another photo you took, showing the hindwings.
http://www.pbase.com/tmurray74/image/133723308
I could also see this being Hyperchiria nausica, although in H. nausica, it looks like the black on the inside of the forewing connects only sometimes. The two species may not even be identifiable by a photo.
Hyperchiria nausica:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxon=Hyperchiria%20nausica
Hyperchiria carabobensis:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxon=Hyperchiria%20carabobensis
Hyperchiria sp., the moths in this genus and related genera are very variable and can be sexually dimorphic to an extent, so the species ID is tentative. I'm basing it primarily in the link in the suggestion. The fourth pair of photos in the link look absolutely identical to yours, so as long as the ID made in the comments below the photos is correct, I think it may be safe to call this one Hyperchiria carabobensis.
Hyperchiria:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=7993
Hyperchiria carabobensis:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxon=Hyperchiria%20carabobensis
Hyperchiria guatemalensis looks similar too:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxon=Hyperchiria%20guatemalensis
Karen, to my eye it looks like it belongs in the same family. If you Google the family a lot comes up with quite a few with the lower wings expanded out beyond the top wings. https://www.google.com/search?q=Lasiocampidae&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=l8T&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=eGkuUejUN6LH0QHizYDQDA&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAQ&biw=1920&bih=951
Thanks drP, and Donna the moth was about 1 inch long.
Jakubko, that other moth looks the same or closely related. Hopefully some day these will be identified.
Comments (16)