Chun, I certainly know that about the tiny little differences ;-)... In the European Lycaenidae you also often need DNA or genital dissection for proper ID.
And in this case it would not even make sense to add Drupadia cf. ravinda, so I would go with the genus name only.
Bayucca's suggestion - Drupadia ravindra, looks similar to this
but I am not going to agree nor disagree with that ID.
Lycaenidae butterflies are really tough to identify because
so many species look almost alike each other.
Just a tiny difference in it's wing patterns may prove it to be a different species.
Based on the markings I think it might be Drupadia ravindra and not Drupadia theda.
http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Drupadia_ravindra_moorei
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c386/moloch05/Malaysia/Mt%20Kinabalu/Mar2012/800/Poringposy2.jpg
Theda should have an "empty" "L" on the hindwing and broader "stripes" on the forewing compared to Ravinda.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/berniedup/8537350873/
http://www.samuibutterflies.com/expeditions/lycaenidae/drupadiatheda/
What do you guys think?
I was thinking that too Chun, from what I saw on learnaboutbutterflies.com, but wasn't sure if it was that genus or not. Some can look so similar but be different genera, hopefully we can get more confirmation.
Comments (7)